The United States’ decision to withdraw from the World Health Organization (WHO) has raised alarm across Africa, with experts and leaders warning of potential health and economic fallout. The move, which will cut significant funding to global health initiatives, is expected to leave the continent’s most vulnerable health programs at risk.
Funding Crisis for Key Health Programs
African nations that depend on U.S. contributions through the WHO to combat diseases such as malaria, HIV/AIDS, and tuberculosis face an uncertain future. Zimbabwe, a major beneficiary of the U.S.-funded President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), has expressed concerns about the potential collapse of its HIV/AIDS programs.
“This decision threatens to undo years of progress in fighting epidemics,” warned Zimbabwe’s Health Minister, who noted the country has received over $1.7 billion from PEPFAR since 2006.
Push for Self-Reliance and Alternative Partnerships
In response to the funding gap, African nations are being urged to reassess their dependence on international aid. Health leaders are advocating for increased domestic investment in healthcare infrastructure and a shift toward regional solutions.
“This is a wake-up call,” said Tanzania’s Health Minister, Asha Mwanyika. “We must prioritize homegrown solutions to secure the health of our people.”
Additionally, many countries are exploring new alliances, with China and the European Union emerging as potential partners. Analysts predict that Beijing could use this opportunity to expand its influence in Africa through increased health-related investments.
Public Health Systems Under Threat
The Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC) has warned that reduced funding will directly impact the WHO’s ability to respond to emergencies in Africa. Delays in vaccine rollouts, such as the new malaria and tuberculosis vaccines, and limited resources during health crises could leave the continent vulnerable to future pandemics.
“Africa relies heavily on WHO-backed systems for rapid response to outbreaks,” said an Africa CDC spokesperson. “This withdrawal risks undermining years of progress in building public health resilience.”
Geopolitical Ramifications
Beyond health, the decision has broader geopolitical implications. South African President Cyril Ramaphosa called the withdrawal “a step backward for global solidarity,” while other leaders have criticized the move as a sign of waning U.S. commitment to global health.
Meanwhile, the U.S. withdrawal has opened the door for China to deepen its engagement in Africa, potentially reshaping global health diplomacy on the continent.
Uncertain Future
As African nations grapple with the fallout of the U.S. decision, the focus is shifting toward finding immediate solutions to sustain health programs and preparing for long-term strategies that prioritize self-sufficiency. For now, the fate of millions depends on how quickly alternative funding sources can be secured.